This bill would be one more nail in the coffin of a country falling under an enormous debt burden,” Man Group chief market strategist Kristina Hooper said last week in interview. President Donald Trump’s “big beautiful” tax bill passed by the U.

Proposed IRC Sec 899 in the House-passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act, would impose escalating tax penalties on foreigners from countries with unfair taxes on U.S. persons.

The decidedly unsexy bond market is usually pretty quiet. But when they want to, bond investors can send a loud, clear message to Washington. They did just that Wednesday and Thursday.

The call by US lawmakers to impose new retaliatory taxes on foreign-owned companies is a strategic move to give the Trump administration leverage to shield American companies from the global minimum tax framework.

Retaliatory taxes on foreign companies operating in the U.S. could open the door for a broader economic conflict.

The president’s efforts to rewrite the DNA of global commerce could complicate the fate of his “Big, Beautiful Bill,” either by diverting the president’s energy or by inviting lawmakers to make changes to the legislation to address unhappiness from the markets and the public.

It turns out that all of those "no" votes in committee didn’t amount to much once the tax bill hit the House floor on Thursday morning.

Financial markets are looking for more “fiscal discipline” from Washington, a top official at the Federal Reserve warned.

House Republicans surprised tech industry watchers and outraged many state governments when they added a clause to Republicans’ signature “big, beautiful” tax bill that bans states and localities from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade.